Esta web utiliza cookies propias y de terceros que nos permiten optimizar tu experiencia en el sitio web, evaluar su rendimiento, generar estadísticas de uso y mejorar y añadir nuevas funcionalidades. Mediante el análisis de tus hábitos de navegación podemos mostrar contenidos más relevantes y medir las interacciones con la web.
Puede obtener más información aquí.

Avanzado
Artículos
Portada

IN RESCRIPTUM BENEDICTI XIV. PONT. MAX. AD POSTULATA SEPTEM IBD

DANIELE CONCINA
NABU PRESS
10 / 2013
9781293123164
Latín

Sinopsis

In Rescriptum Benedicti XIV. Pont. Max. Ad Postulata Septem Archiepiscopi Compostellae Ieiunii Legem Spectantia Commentarius Theologicus... is a theological commentary by Daniele Concina, written in Latin. This work delves into the rescript of Pope Benedict XIV concerning the requests of the seven Archbishops of Compostela regarding the law of fasting. The commentary provides a detailed analysis of the theological and canonical implications of the papal response, offering insights into the religious practices and legal interpretations of the 18th-century Catholic Church. Scholars and students of ecclesiastical history, canon law, and theology will find this text a valuable resource for understanding the intricacies of papal decrees and their impact on religious observance.This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.